BLOG

Why should I spend so much on developing a custom website when I can develop it at dirt-cheap cost? Oh yes! You may be right — but have you pondered over it deeply? What if your website builder suffers a malware attack, and it crashes? I’m sure you’ll not have thought about this scenario. DIY website builder tools suffer from many such deficiencies. Popular website builder tools, such as Weebly, Squarespace, or Wix do offer plenty of options to create a small website effortlessly at tempting costs. But they still stand no chance against a custom website developed by a professional agency. Consider the following 5 reasons before opting for a website builder tool.

A website for small businesses should be designed in a way that could attract customers. From powerful headlines, delivery of the right marketing message, to a visual hierarchy and other key elements—every component of the puzzle should fall in place. The real reasons behind the sheer brilliance of a website lie in its layout or architecture. It’s actually the first stage of the website design where you decide which component will go where, what will be the layout style, size and website component. It defines the navigation path and specifies spaces where the most important elements such as headline, subheadings, images, videos, CTA buttons, forms and other elements will be placed.

So you have decided to launch a brand new website to augment your business. You certainly deserve a pat on the back for this smart decision. And since your tech team doesn’t have enough bandwidth or capability, you’re looking to get a contractor on board as fast as you can. But who should you be working with — a web development company or a freelancer? The decision can be tricky, and making the wrong choice here means your dream of a digital presence for your business can fail. A careful and thorough analysis of both options can easily reveal that hiring a web development company has a distinct and unbeatable edge over a freelance web developer. Here are 7 strong reasons for the former: